RE: Its very likely Ritchie would have won every match and we would have been challenging for a play-off spot had he not been sacked .........your turn
so What in your opinion should we have done at the time? Let him talk to Wednesday? Do you think there was a real chance he would get the job if we had? Do you not even consider Dave Allen was playing mind games? How much stick would the club have come in for from the very people who have subsequently said AR was badly done to for letting him talk to Wednesday when we could quite correctly stop our contracted employee from doing so? If we had let him talk to them do you consider it would have been in the best interests of BFC at the time?
It would have been in the best interests as Gordo obviouslu had no respect for Ritchies abilities. He should have binned him the week after the Wednesday game.</p> I know thats with Hindsight , but surely Gordo could have used a bit of Foresight as ONLY he seems to know what was going on.</p>
Just like you called Ritchie a "pratt" just slightly hypocritical wouldn't you say? but you chose to ignore me on that one.
I agree he should have gone then I think gordy swas fearful of a fans backlash and was determined to try to get him to change tack until it was certain that he would not. A right royal **** up.
I agree he should have gone then I think gordy was fearful of a fans backlash and was determined to try to get him to change tack until it was certain that he would not. A right royal **** up.
No other serious options? Only Redfearn or Blackwell? Perhaps he wanted Blackwell but could not afford him?
RE: No other serious options? Or Blackwell didnt fancy the players "the club" had lined up.</p> I still think we will win Tuesday, I dont understand why the players no longer seem able to pass ti each other.</p>
http://www.barnsleyfc.org.uk/bbs/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=27485&mid=170339#M170339 http://www.barnsleyfc.org.uk/bbs/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=27485&mid=170339#M170339
Fair do's Have to say I never remembered him using such terms. Criticism in abundance but not personal abuse. But the evidence is there so fair enough.
RE: Just like you called Ritchie a "pratt" PRATT (Point Refuted A Thousand Times) is a common phrase used by posters of online debating forums, and refers specifically to any argument that has, as the name suggests, been refuted time and time again. This is particularly frequent in 'Creation vs Evolution' forums, or other forums of a controversial nature.</p> It is generally used in a demeaning context.</p> </p> Bit different from calling some one a pillock.</p><font face="#mce_temp_font#" />
sorry, I dont buy it Are you now saying that you said this sentance? "We are a traditional 2nd tear Club you Point Refuted A Thousand Times"
We could have stuck Stephen Hawking on against Southend, by himself, and got a result. We could have blindfolded him against Ipswich. That's six points accounted for.
RE: sorry, I dont buy it Well not my most perfect grammer I agree but Ritchie showed a complete lack of knowledge about this club.</p> </p> </p>
I think you need to get out more. Watching training sessions is desperate and the occupation of the unemployed.
RE: I think you need to get out more. It's common for a coach to go and watch other coaches working with their teams and Sunday and Monday are my Days off. </p>