Thanks for agreeing with me again - this is my point exactly!. If he was doing what he should have been doing - that is hanging about up front doing threatening those strong runs at goals where he never scored - 1. Stoke would have instinctively put men on him and wouldn't have built that pressure that saw us conceed three goals - and 2. the useless fecker wouldn't have been in our penalty area to to give away a penalty in the first place.