Keith hill is going to be on talk sport after 7.45

i'm just fine thanks, he just doesn't pull the wool over my eyes. think he's got a spell on some of you lot, or in a trance.

 

Do you hold Keef responsible for everthing that might be wrong at Oakwell?

 

Eyes wide open mate.

 

no i hold him resposible for signing ex rochdale and lower league *****, and the negative football. that in it's own way leads to lower crowds and less revenue for the club.

 

Do you ever stop to consider we are signing "lower league *****" because that it where our budget puts us?

 

so why are they mostly ex rochdale, doesn't take much working out. posh have just signed a central defender, knight-percival from wrexham, i will guarantee he will be better than any lower league defender hill has signed

 

You complain about the loss of crowds and less revenue but yet you said yesterday you'll hardly go to Oakwell next season.

So your to blame too.

 

Can't have it both ways - if we'd have got this kid on a pre-contract agreement then you'd have gone skitty. They've also paid £1.5 million for a League Two striker.

Who's he signed that played for Rochdale? From memory, Perkins (years ago), Wiseman, Done, Higginbotham, Dagnall? Perkins & Done have been decent, can't judge Dagnall or Higginbotham and Wiseman has been disappointing but it's a big jump.

We'll sell McNulty for plenty in the next two years.

 

because he's made me fed up. spouting ******, being negative, ***** players. better things to spend £400 on than that.

 

mcnulty can't defend and thinks he's bobby moore. he will be back in league 1 quick sharp. and are you sure about dagnall? wiseman just can't defend

 

Likes playing football. If we gave him someone to pass to (Perkins/Drinkwater) we'd be fine.

Dagnall - I'm not judging anyone that's played for us for 8 games, especially in our side and how poor we've been for 3 months.

Wiseman's getting better, again little protection for him in ages but still not convinced.

Next year's massive for all concerned.

 

wiseman's been better when not in the back 4.

 

Bobby's a better defender, granted. But he's injured. And we have no other right back. Hand forced.

 

What about Stones?
He is a right back aint he?
He must be a better defender than Wiseman! Who I think is better attacking, but gives me the jitters when he has to defend. I know he played well against Peterbro, but that is one match out of 20 odd.

 

Think he usually plays centre half. Difficult to bring a 17 year old in when we've been so poor though, surely?

Biggest loss has been O'Brien down that right hand side helping out.

 

It cant be any worse than bringing in a player like Dagnall, who looks like a rabbit caught in the headlights! At 17 he has no fear, looked ok when he came on other week. Give him a shot, I would rather use the Academy kids than bring in Loans to sit on the bench!!!

 

Agree, but can understand why he's not played him. And considering the form we've been in I wouldn't have liked to give him a run in the side with no protection in front of him.

And you're right RE loan players, but we've still seen more young lads this year than we have in most other years. Just hope we see more of 'em next year.

 

i think digby would have relished playing in these games after his first couple. banished away again has he? got to be better option than smith or doyle

 

Banished? Been watching too much game of thrones.

Nar, reckon we'll see him again this season but never expected him to play plenty.

 

Not been on much over last few days but you are still talking the same old bull.

Paul Digbys INJURED INJURED INJURED.