Khalids announcement

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Ianharifax, May 14, 2023.

  1. orsenkaht

    orsenkaht Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    11,856
    Likes Received:
    11,653
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    This is bang on the point, in my view. If a longer ter lease were granted - let's say 99 years - the ownership group would have plenty of incentive to improve the ground. On the back of that is the possibility of bigger crowds, increased revenue, and further investment in the team. Whether it will work out like that? Who knows?
     
    Sestren likes this.
  2. Red

    Redsnut Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,307
    Likes Received:
    1,372
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Club is never going to progress while we do not own the ground I disagree with you.
     
  3. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,300
    Likes Received:
    29,362
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Unless it's a LONG term lease in which case they can spend as much money as they want improving it without any risk of losing their investment
     
  4. Ses

    Sestren Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,820
    Likes Received:
    4,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The council owning the ground and leasing it to the club for anything between 99 and 999 years would probably be the best option to allow redevelopment while protecting Oakwell from being sold off.
     
    TonyTyke likes this.
  5. MDG

    MDG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,813
    Likes Received:
    4,319
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wilthorpe
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Just a scenario. Council owning 100% means a disconnect to the playing side. So they could up and leave to somewhere they do own.
     
  6. ley

    leythtyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2019
    Messages:
    8,194
    Likes Received:
    12,127
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    That would involve leaving Barnsley or building something new which would require planning permission from their current landlord
     
  7. Gally

    Gally Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    17,039
    Likes Received:
    12,610
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    York
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Not the club. OCA
     
  8. matoakwell

    matoakwell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    OP has disappeared since he got you all frothing. I'm calling WUM.
     
    anstonred and Redstone like this.
  9. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,300
    Likes Received:
    29,362
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    There has been no decision made yet by the council on the future of oakwell and no change in ownership. From the horse's mouth.
     
  10. Micky Finn

    Micky Finn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2005
    Messages:
    16,300
    Likes Received:
    13,085
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Light bender
    Location:
    It depends who's asking...
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I've got another word....
     
    matoakwell and Redstone like this.
  11. wak

    wakeyred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    9,825
    Likes Received:
    8,582
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    the clues in my imaginative online moniker
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Well look, I'm guessing the council are not flush with cash, all the regeneration we see going on is funded elsewhere - i.e the council aren't paying for it. I'm further going to guess that such funding is not going to stretch to the football stadium. Therefore any money invested in the stadium would be directly funded by local council tax payers at the expense of something currently being funded unless they are proposing to add 10% on everyone's bill as extra money for said stadium, furthermore I'm guessing that getting commercial loans, etc, the kind that private individuals and businesses can secure is not accessible to councils - hence why the joint council owners of Leeds bradford Airport sold it because it needed a big investment of commercial cash for expansion.
     
  12. Com

    Come on Tarn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,242
    Likes Received:
    941
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Considering the amount BMBC has spent on the town centre,spending a bit on BFC won’t bankrupt them.The amount the football club generates season in season out on match days makes it a win/win situation.
     
    leythtyke likes this.
  13. ley

    leythtyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2019
    Messages:
    8,194
    Likes Received:
    12,127
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Whether the budget is there, and whether it is a good use of budget are two different things, the post I replied to was asking if it's a useful allocation of resources. Given the positive impact that getting better attendances into Oakwell would have on local pubs, restaurants, shops etc... then I'd say it is.

    For some reason, investment in sports and the arts is always seen as a waste of public money, and I don't really buy into that theory.
     
    Come on Tarn likes this.

Share This Page