Look at your post again You're telling me that I had no good reason to approach the issue and you're suggesting I have some sinister motives for commenting on the story. That's certainly implied, anyway. I believe that money going from the club I love to a man very much associated with this BBS, who has a very questionable past, is something I should be allowed to comment on without being accused of making mischief or having ulterior motives. The whole issue of convicted criminals winning prize money is a very hot topic in itself that has often been raised on here, but when the recipient and the competition runner are so close to home then the issue becomes extremely pertinent. I'm getting a bit ****** off with being told I had no good reason for approaching the subject. As for this group that I mentioned, well maybe that wasn't called for, but I certainly get the impression that the London Tykes would like to silence anyone who suggests what Tommy did may actually have been a bad thing.
I think you've misread me </p> My posts are directed generally to those who feel the need to bring it up.</p> I'm not questioning your right to say what you have. In fact I think you've every right and I don't necessarily disagree with your opinion.</p> I'm certainly NOT suggesting that YOU have any sinister motives.</p>
RE: I don't think you have any worries in that direction. </p> Maybe, I don't recall it at this moment. I only read certain threads on here unless I need to because of an alertetc</p>
The thing is It was my posts that were deleted. Threads that I started. When you and others are talking about these people bringing the subject up, you're talking about me and what I said. As such, I think I have every right to defend that.
Fair point </p> But really I am not questioning your right to post such topics.</p> I do think however that there are people who actuallylove jumping on it everytime its mentioned and its those people I am referring to. They may also have equally valid reasons but I don't know of any.</p>
Maybe someone can dig it out for you. </p> Ican only assume that that's the version of events the London Tykes, who I believe to be a generally decent bunch, have gone for. </p>
RE: Maybe someone can dig it out for you. </p> I don't know where you're going with this but I'd like to point out that the London Tykes are a group of individuals who do not think or make decisionsor judgements asone collective.</p> I'd much rather you speak about specific members or individuals if you have a point to make, rather than the group as a whole. </p>
Good point. I apologise. </p> Iwas assuming, as Corke is often seen with the London Tykes, that you all tolerate him. Obviously this is not neccessarily the case.</p>
No its not I do not for one second condone any drug use, but to say that a cannabis offence is the equal of Child Pornography is downright stupid.