Let everyone have their say.

I havent.

 

I'm not going to trawl the BBS for examples, and i don't know how to link to threads anyway, but a quick search and i found an example straight away in the England U19s thread:

The 'you seem to have an obsession with young boys' comment and your reply to back it up:
'Bet there's no kleenex left in Hemsworth tonight'.

You've literally just said you haven't seen examples of him liking young boys and in that thread you've responded yourself. Either you've a very short memory, or you're trying to pull the wool over people's eyes. I've also seen other examples of people responding in a similar fashion.

I don't want to get into a back-and-forth with you, and I've been supportive to you in other ways recently with you speaking out on your mental health issues, which is commendable. But consider the possible damage these comments could do to that individual mentally (or physically, if someone targets him) however much you or others dislike him. For the reasons I've given above, for the damage those accusations can do, I'll be calling it out in future. I'm not going to turn a blind eye. The poster obviously infuriates you, so my advice would be put him on ignore.

 

Clearly my comment was written as a joke and should be taken as such.

I would never call someone out like that. I know which other poster you are referring to and he hasnt called him out either. All he has stated is that when it cones to football he only sees talent in young lads. If someone thinks that is a sexual reference then thats their problem.

 

'An obsession with young boys' is very different from saying there is value in young footballers. An obsession with young boys absolutely suggests it's sexual, what else could it possibly mean? You're being disingenuous. Anyway, I'll leave it for others to make up their own minds. I'm dipping out at this point. But you should own what you write. And probably stick the lad on ignore, it's not healthy.

 

Let everyone have their say.....

 

That's it, I'm sure a bit of banter contributed to the disabled refugee's murder i referenced above. But let's not let that get in the way of a good laugh eh? That's what i don't get with some people; if it's someone's mental health, it gets the recognition and support it deserves; if it's suggesting an arguably unpopular poster is a peaodophile it's 'banter,' regardless of the effect it has on them. I stand by what I've put anyway.

 

You are going totally ott here. No one has called him a peadophile. You are making things out to be a lot worse than they are on here.

 

I think if someone post that stuff on here they should be banned. Admin set rules and carry out the process.

 

I agree. However, if someone posts something I find objectionable, I'll pass comment on it, irrespective of who else has commented.

 

The meme I posted was referencing you threatening to report stuff. Nothing to do with someone’s murder or anyone else. Chill dude.