Let's get one thing straight re: Muller's injury

In Da Treasure Chest nt

 

Because our official ***** rarely breaks news first, like it's suppose to. Tomorrow something will be put up, but to loads of us it will be old news.

 

lets get another few things straight....

answer any of these either yes or no

q1 - would muller have stayed on if we'd had another keeper on the bench?
q2 - if the injury wasnt made worse by playing on in the 2nd half would you, again, trust the oppinion of the person who scanned muller at half time?
q3 - do you think muller would have won us more than 3 points if he'd have played for the rest of the season?

i personally went no, no, yes.

i also think (partly after reading davets comments post match) that this situation could possibly backfire bigtime.

davey fan or not. if a player (who hasnt ducked out of a game since signing) doesnt feel comfortable in staying on then you should listen to them. Didnt davey have to finish his carreer early due to injury? Irrisponsible to say the least.

 

You are right to say that nothing has been confirmed and before getting too down we ought to see what official source says...However, whether it is a serious injury or not Davey still comes out of it in a bad light. If he did make Muller play on when he didn't feel able to (implication of Davey's post match brag and the fact that Muller couldn't kick, jump or take any weight on his knee)) he did it to justify his ridiculous theory that you only need one keeper on the bench. This seems to be typical of a stubborn character.

 

Is that you talking?

 

I agree except Davey did it for one reason: 3 points. There was no being proud or stubborn etc it was to win the game. I just hope it isn't that bad and that we have a GK on bench from now on

 

I agree except Davey did it for one reason: 3 points. There was no being proud or stubborn etc it was to win the game. I just hope it isn't that bad and that we have a GK on bench from now on