A debate is the last thing it is. You clearly have neither the brains nor the experience. Or the good sense to remove your foot from your gob, when you’ve been repeatedly schooled.. I don’t give a toss, you’re funny..
I wasn’t wrong was I? clearly we’re not bothered about the 3 points on here today….. Looking forward to the next female referee being at Oakwell….
She was a **** ref and therefore deserves all the abuse she gets, just like men refs do when they are ****. If anyone thinks we should go easier on her because she's a woman then should give their heads a wobble. Questions should be asked as to why she was given the game.
You’re not getting back into Oakwell, the way you’re going, lad. I’d concentrate more on your schoolwork..
He’s being built up too soon for me. Could end up ruining him if we’re not careful. He’s physically miles off at the moment, just don’t t get the clamour to play him at all.
I think frustration is the emotion today, it feels like 2 points dropped but like you say absolutely no reason for panic and the playoffs are definitely achievable with plenty more twists and turns to come in the process.
The ref was appallingly bad . The fact she was female does not one matter one iota. I think she should look at her performance closely. Just to add kitchen was awful today and the bench is seriously lacking.
Ooo before I forget..just before we scored...Phillips belted the ball at their lad, which hit him in the face and he went down. The ball then came out to (I think Phillips again) in the area....result. The game was stopped but re started with a drop ball to Stanley in their area not to us , who had possession of the football and ready to have a shot. Can anyone explain please?
I did earlier in this thread. Because the ball was in the area when the ref stopped the game the ball is given to the keeper to restart. Ref did nothing wrong that time. Pretty unsportsmanlike for Accrington to make no attempt to give us the ball back afterwards mind
Think the "**** ref"seems to be unanimous. Whether this has anything to do with her being a female is what's being disputed!
Thank you...sorry I missed your earlier post. That does clear that up. Stanley should have lobbed it back to us.
No, it's not a debate. A debate requires two sides of informed discussion. You're just repeatedly spewing uninformed sexist b0llocks and people are calling you out on it. No debate here.