RE: Well, it seems thats not the stance being taken by Site Admin nt But Back to the Madeline case, I sincerley hope that she is still alive but if not that the parents had nowt to do with it, but in any case, they have the burden of responsibility (which I am sure they realise) and to paint it any other way is just wrong
talk about stunts, i refer to my posting yesterday about the possibility of the McCanns having munchausens by proxy............we have seen it before in this country with suspects...................
They've acted suspiciously right from the off. The only thing that I can't believe is that they have only been interviewed once before this. Surely as the only confirmed witnesses they should have been interviewed formally more than once in case they thought of anything else?
whatever people may think, there is soemthing very strange about this case, a child 'dissapears' without any signs of forced entry, there are rumours about the mccanns as parents, there are no real suspects, even after 4 months. the portugese police arent as bad as the keystone cops, and even the vatican, as we have heard has now removed the mccanns from the website...............it is VERY strange why only one of the parents has been back to this country in all this time, they have, apparently only just told the other children that their sister is missing............there is something very wrong about all this........ and you have to look at the parents
Don't worry, I lose most people lol including myself half the time. I meant does 'people on this board' include you when you refer to their ironic stance?
I'll be straight with you Im finding it very difficult to justify coming on here knowing that persons of said background frequent.
My opinion (for what it's worth) is he should be allowed to continue posting as much as he wants (there's no reason why he can't still be a barnsley fan) but site admin should make that under the condition that hsi signature says who he is so everybody who he has contact with via this site has warning and can be protected. Hiding under a new name is just wrong. But that's just my opinion.
dont know for sure but i am guessing at LordRaglan,may be wrong tho just something that was said on here,a cryptic clue
Presume you mean MR TT himself - TEEHEE (NOT ) Agree with you totally - at laest if he's here and we know who he is he can treated accordingly and IGNORED
Now Updated: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6982969.stm It seems that they want to ask her certain questions and they have to make her "a suspect" in order for her to be allowed to keep silent... Strange turn of events to say the least