I see In that case, perhaps what you meant is we were playing against 12 Latin Americans. The people of the world can indeed be categorised in many ways, geographic and ethnic origins are among these. So why confuse the issue by using geographical terminology to describe racial and cultural characteristics? And anyway, go stand in the corner. You're talking *****.
**** off thee. It had occurred to me to introduce the term "Latin American" but we both know what Eastie's reaction to that would have been. Mexicans are South Americans. Is it alright if I lie in the corner? Of me patio? With a beer?
So if we discount Geography and which football group they play in I'm a bit puzzled what criteria are left to decide that they belong to a continent primary definition must be the geographic one which states that Mexico is the most northerly central american country and is in the North American land mass You could argue that if they played their qualification in with the south american countries that made them "south American" but they dont so what is left option 1 they speak spanish - so do people in Spain and that was in Europe last time I checked option 2 - Windy knows everything and has decided that Mexico is in South America - with all the authority of the King who decreed that Pi was 4 Obviously Windy will come back with the last word on this
If you must pursue this infatuation with arguing with me you might want to choose a less hopeless cause next time. Like trying to say that hunts don't encourage fox-breeding. pff-ff-ff!
oh and... They do not speak "Spanish" per se...it's a wonderful dialect called "Hispanic" sorry to piss on your parade on this one handsome..xxxx
Ignoring your attempt to change the argument Why are Mexicans South Americans. I have given 2 reasons why they are not - you havent given any good reason why they are And your cultural argument doesnt wash either - we are culturally closer to Canadians than Rumanians but we are still European not North American