Of course a sychophantic, superficial, overpaid waste of space... Like Jonathan Ross would be the man I'd choose to decide who can and can't have kids. Him and Ruby Wax and then that way all our kids can learn to kiss a celebrity's / royal's / politician's a*se at a hundred paces...
W*nker of the very highest order. Note how he never slates a film when one of its stars happens to be a future guest on his 'chat' show.
agree with him 100% not all but a lot of council house tennants give the rest a bad name,with ther chavtastic fashions and inbred views,they should be banned from breeding,because thats the problem the kids grow up to be like there parents and so it goes on!cue abuse(blagger)
On TV last night Documentary on ITV about women who drink whislt pregnant - 18 year old girl, 22 weeks gone out drinking, but its okay, she's only having 6 guinesses, she'd normally have twice as many. There's one candidate for you.
If things dont change then someone will decide who can and cant have children. You will need a license to have kids , prove you can financially support the child , have your lifestyle scrutinised.</p> Its on its way unless something is done.</p>
RE: If things dont change then someone will decide who can and cant have children. I'm in a good job, my wife works as well, we have a nice house in a good suburb (unfortunately its a suburb of Manchester, but hey ho), we are doing alright and last night we had a discussion about having a second child and came to the conclusion that right now we are not in a position to have one. Does no one else do this?
RE: Agreed Is that just women, cos I love Guinness, mainly cos its like food and drink all rolled into one.
It gets more expensive the more you have. We've 3 and it costs a fortune, bit too late for us to turn back mind.
I don't believe you No one actually likes Guinness, it's just a masculinity thing, you have to pretend to like it, like a bit of a rite of passage. it's bloody awful.
RE: If things dont change then someone will decide who can and cant have children. No. Kids are churned out with no regard for how they are going to be looked after and the cycle is then repeated.</p> It's the 21st Century and our society has produced some people who have such low aspirations that they cannot see beyond having a child.</p>
RE: If things dont change then someone will decide who can and cant have children. That’s the problem. The sensible people who can provide a good upbringing and issue a sense of morality tend to think these through and decide only to have 1 or 2 kids or maybe even not to have any. As a mate of mine said to his missus, they both have good jobs, nice house etc, they are decent, moral people but they've chosen not to have children, yet they are the type of people who ought to have children . On the other hand there are some people who don't give 2 shits what their kids are up to and they'll continue to have more - I was going to the shop a few weeks ago and in front of my was a woman talking to her kid who was about 10, and giving him the key to the house whilst saying she was off to the pub and would be back at 11!
RE: If things dont change then someone will decide who can and cant have children. Whereabouts in Manchester do you live?</p>
RE: If things dont change then someone will decide who can and cant have children. If I tell you will I have any electrical equipment left when I get home from work?
No, I really do like it But I have had all my tastebuds erased by overeating of vinegary foods such as pickled onions.