At the risk of being accused as a club apologist again, I don't mind the home one. It would look better with a sponsor. Not a fan of the detail on the away. And pink and red as a combination is certainly, out there.
if I was buying I’d try a womens on and if it fitted I’d prob buy a womens to get the sponsor on as it looks like a shirt rather than the training kit
Just seen a comment on X suggesting that VFiles is JAQ's own company, is that allowed? Sort of...sponsoring yourself isn't it?
Last seasons home kit was fantastic, this one's is absolutely the most boring one in our history. Should have gone with your own opinion again JAQ. West Stand will love it mind, apart from white shorts....
'orrible red scouser vibes on home kit and the pink 'un is foookin' horrific, mi jooolie bin ont acid tabs ageeean ???............sithi.
Just a bit bland for me. I might get one at the end of the season when they’re in the sale but wouldn’t pay full whack for one.
"The Men’s, Children’s and Infant kits will retail without any advertisements on the front of the shirt whilst we are proud to include the logo of our sponsor Parliament on the back of each jersey." Clearly states in the article no front of shirt sponsor
My expert opinion: 1. I like the away kit and might get that 2. Pink one not for me at all but some might like it 3. Home one - we are the red and white army. Very frustrating that this hasn’t been considered 4. Everyone says the kits are rubbish every single season
Its not great news for me, I'm well aware of your wannabe clever statement, I wouldn't part money for any of them. Its the families who have kids and buy them, pure garbage put out by the club yet again and charge the earth for it.
A positive for me though is that like them or not they are clearly bespoke to BFC, the criticism of them being a puma template with an extra £30 for a stitch on badge can’t be levelled as has been the case in some previous years.