Nick Colgan

So Lucas is a good 'keeper is he?

Why don't you add Mark Crossley to your poll? He'll probably be available in the summer.

Presumably, the experts who have voted for Lucas are doing so based upon a 45 minute substitue appearance.

 

RE: So Lucas is a good 'keeper is he?

No i think people have it based on his good Wednesday form as well. Plus on the form of Colgan who would be liked by more fans if he came off his line more and played it from the back instead of a big hoof.

 

the theory is

Colgan is ***** (which isnt true) and because Lucas came for crosses he is better (which isnt true)</p>

</p>

The fact is Colgan has his faults and im sure lucas does too, Having only seenLucas play 45min it is hard to judge.</p>

</p>

Maybe we would be better with Lucas, Long term i think we need to get someone in</p>

 

Very mature and well reasoned case

So I claim that post as one of my own .

 

Think we are lucky to have 2 goalkeepers of that standard. Colgan has his weaknesses (crosses, coming off the line, communication, kicking, distribution) but is a fantastic shot stopper. Lucas seems to be the opposite. He does all the things Colgan is poor at well. He did drop a ball in his only 45 mins in a red shirt but I felt he was fouled and it cant be easy coming on as a goalkeeper. I think he is worth giving a full game. The Wendesday fans I have spoken to all rate him as a keeper.

 

Well Said! Although i am not an NC fan. Good Shot Stopper but thats it! I would like to see DL given a run. i thought he might when NC went off injured against Hull, but he was back for Stoke.

 

Seemingly Davey thinks Colgan is perfect and deserves to jump straight back in after a keeper keeps a clean sheet on his debut.