I hope Sheriff or Archefield can put some light on this question. A while back I read on here that any repayments on the purchase of BFC had to come from the owners own funds.If thats right would that have been made legal? Because the money came out of BFC funds would or should James and Jean refused the payment and stuck to the prior agreement. If the payment had have been refused the majority owners would then have had to pay out of there own pockets or at least take it out of Pacific Media Group.Maybe if that had been done that would the owners have come over in a different light.?