on the evidence that <strike>round is better than square for a football</strike></p> <strike>therefore F=R/S</strike></p> <strike>thus footballer = jaRman not hayeS</strike></p> hayes is ***** and puts no effort in and Jarman is the opposite.</p>
RE: on the evidence that we need to stop mistaking ability to run abart for actual quality.</p> he might make a good player. But will he be developed by Ritchie and Tubs? I doubt it.</p> As for Hayes.....only the manager can answer taht one. Some swear blind that Hayes works hard aswell...personally I don't think he does, but I think he has more quality than Richards</p>
RE: on the evidence that i agree he is probably the more talented striker at the club (apart from maybe nardi who can also be lazy) but i just cant stand a player who doesnt put effort in. </p> if he scores its all right tho, so lets hope he goes on a run n we dont need the jarmeister.</p>
RE: Mike sheron the 2nd Sheron did get goals hayes is awful Can't believe that Ritchie spent all that money on him We are a laughing stock with him up front No wonder Rotherham felt secure today.
Piss poor today again. Plays well about once every 3 games. we have been done by scunny. Dont give me that glassback nardiello *****...hes worse. Bring back Sheron
RE: Hayes you talk ****** mr no it all,hayes is ****,he doesn,t score enough goals,thats a strikers primary job to score goals,we would have won the last 2 matches if it wasn,t for his wayward finishing!