We can keep debating if you like I'm still waiting for the day someone just sticks to their guns without resorting to sarcasm or insults. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Here are my slightly less subjective ratings Davies - Orange Bree - Blue Roberts - Red Mawson - Green White - Grey Scowen - Purple Hourihane - Yellow Hammill 7 - Ivory Watkins - Brown Moncur - Cyan Bradshaw - Magenta Yids - Olive Green, with the odd moment of apple white.
I've given up debating because your most cognitive answer is a glorified version of saying "Your wrong" and I'm guessing alot of people don't like continuing to argue with you because your stubborn and you portray yourself as better than everyone else, I've given my reasons why I think Scowen played well today you came back and said you wanted him to do everything despite defending Hammill who was no where near Scowen in any aspect of their respective games today.
Personally thought Roberts was more of a deep Burgundy but I agree about Moncur matched his hair very well
I agree Scowen played well but he wasn't a 9/10. A 9/10 is rare and if that was Scowen at 90% his best then he isn't good enough for the Championship. I'd say he has at least another 30% performance wise to his game than what he showed tonight. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So your judging that on today's performance unless Scowen plays a 10/10 all season then he isn't good enough for the Championship, if so I don't really think you understand how ratings or actual football works. No one plays 10/10 every game all season infact alot of successful teams often average around an 8/9 of 10 most matches at a higher level than we are at, personally I thought Scowen had a very good game and performed his role well you may not see it the same way but then we are all different I just don't believe I should change my opinion just because you say I'm wrong when the only way you've said he could be better is that he has "to be better at everything and win games by himself".
To be fair I think he's saying that 9 out of 10 would designate an ' outstanding' performance one that people would talk about for ages. The sort of display where you do win games on your own. No one on either team played at that level last night. So you go down a level to a high 7 or 8 which would be good or very good ( which Scowen was). For my own part. I'd say just because someone was a stand out player doesn't mean they were outstanding. Against a decent league 1 team Josh did well.
Roberts was far better than Mawson tonight. Mawson's individual error nearly meant we were out in normal time, Roberts saved him on that occasion
You're going down completely the wrong road with this. Never mind. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
At Least I incite footballing debate. That's what forums are for in my opinion. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk