As usual a pundit on sky justifying 'buying' a penalty. In fact both of them are saying it's a penalty despite there being no touch simply because Collins slid out. I no longer understand football
Who is this **** in the studio? "I think it's a penalty, there's not much contact, but the way he slid out..." What the **** is that supposed to mean?
Sky morons including a sore Reading player, say it was a penalty!!?!!! Keith Andrews called it spot on, in the moment.
"Maybe there was no contact...but the way he slid out" So he cheated? These pundits can **** right off
The fact that he didn't touch him shows how in control Collins was. You could see the point he pulled back.
What part of didn't touch him don't they understand. Clear dive. No wonder Collins was going spare at the ref
I'm just shaking my head at the guys in the Sky studio. They just watched the replays in slow mo show that there was zero contact and that he dived like a swan and then they say it's a penalty. FFS, I give up.
I don't see why our lads yellows should stay after such a poor decision. The Sky pundits both agreed it was a penalty when they have seen the replay God knows how many times. I'd like them to explain how the attacker managed to fall the way he did from the body shape of the keeper if they think contact was made.
I've said this for years but any time that a pundit on a TV station says anything like "he deserved to buy that" or "he had a right to go down there" should incur a massive fine from the fa to that station as it's the only way to stop them from encouraging cheating
We're very frail both at the back and in midfield without the ball. Great goal. But otherwise not threatening up front either. We're not being outplayed though. We rarely are.