Stakes are going up Eastie It's not just the preposterous figure of 30% of your wage, which has just been plucked out of the air, but now you've also got to go and see him once a week, for reasons we can only guess. Not sure how they're going to enforce that, but there you go. If you agree to that, I'm sure the next step will be that you have to suck the prisoners **** and on and on it will go until you agree with him. Just humour humour the daft lovely person and say he's right, then maybe he'll go away.
You are putting forward a completely ridiculous, hypothetical question which has no relevance whatsoever to a debate on capital punishment. Of course I wouldn't go to see him, just because I don't support capital punishment does not believe I support the crime! FFS! It's like when people say who would commit the act of capital punishment and some people say they would do it themselves - I don't believe that if it really came down to it that 95% of those people could actually go through with it, but they say them would to an hypothetical question knowing that the situation would never arise and they would never be tested on it. P.s. Based on what you've said over the last few days though, I have little doubt you would probably be in the remaining 5%
RE: Stakes are going up Eastie answer it then come on you are sponsoring this prisoner do do things by half?
RE: Stakes are going up Eastie Damn! I was hoping I was going to get a murderer who was a woman! At least I'd get something out of it!
Let me think I think I'll still tick the YES box! See what happens when you post hypothetical situations? I can give an hypothetical answer! I'm just waiting to see how much more ridiculous you can make it from your initial proposal that people are allowed to decide exactly what areas their taxation funds - because if you can't see the dangers and chaos such a system would create I'm not sure what to suggest.
Well you have just confirmed the fact that you are an absolute tw*t. Firstly you are a liar because i would 100% put my life on it you would not, secondly if you said no you would a ipocrit so in anycase i have just managed to prove you are a waste of time with no proper opinions and the ones you have are all ***** to look good on this board. You need to take a long hard look at yourself people like you drag this great nation down A answer that would have given me respect for you would be something like No i would'nt tick the ues box because i wount give my money to a murderer however i dont agree with executions in stead you have just tried to look clever. So basically you have just agreed to help people that murder by sponsoring them to live a comfortable life after they take loved ones from family member!
Are they already prisoners when they commit murder ? If so then they are just murdering other prisoners so what's your problem ?
Wtf? I think you're making less and less sense everytime you post. Gotta say from a neutral point of view regards you and Eastie, it's not him who's been made to look like a tit...
Agreed - trying too hard. </p> An essential element of a good wind-up is knowing when to stop. Your exit strategy should leave them shaking their fists at the screen not skipping over your posts.</p>
It's ok EastStander You can pay 30% of your taxes to keeping a prisoner locked up and he can pay 30% of his paying for the 20 years of death row and appeals plus an additional 25% of his wages to go into a government compensation pot that will be used to pay the millions in compensation to the families of wrongly murdered innocent people.
This ere sponsoring a murderer Do you get to pring your name on their prison uniforms ? And can you set them Big Brother style tasks in order to win their 'snout' ?