Questions for our CEO

This is true.

 

That's the reason why they DON'T publish it. It's a deliberate tactic so that they can distance themselves from the message the fans receive and can blame it on the middle man or just that the tone was lost when reading. It's the ONLY reason that makes sense for refusing to make it available.

 

Didn't Patrick have one recorded at the No7? Pretty sure that was the revelation that Stones had been sold for an even lower fee than we expected at the time.

 

Are they refusing? Has anyone asked them to publish it? Will the supporters trust?

 

They've been asked to in the past and refused and to be honest if they need to be specifically asked in order to realise that fans of a club will want to hear or see it then they're so far out 9f touch that they're not fit to do the job in the first place

 

They have to be made publicly available. The previous one is, not sure why the latest isn't

It really isn't.

I record all the webinars I give but end up releasing very few of them. For a multitude of reasons none of which are sinister or trying to withhold information.

 

What are the reasons generally and do you do the webinars to a small minority of interested people with no intention of releasing them but with the small minority of people instructed to take notes and pass the information back to more people?

 

Best summing up on Tykes Mad by East Stand Red.

 

Not everything has to be a conspiracy.

 

Many reasons, one may be that someone asks me a question that is, shall we say, not very well thought out and doesn't make them look all that intelligent. I don't want expose them to that so I edit it out, but then the next 10 minutes don't make sense, so that goes, and just becomes so much hassle and so time consuming, that's before you go into copyrighted material and permissions and all sorts of other legal areas that do not apply to a talk but do apply if you publish.

 

These owners have shown me nothing to believe they have honest intentions or anything to believe they tell the truth. An I wrong to distrust them fully? You tell me

 

Can you link to the previous safety inspection report then please as I can't find it?

 

I couldn't resist a little dig whilst I was over there.

 

I don't trust them either, I've tried admirably to stick by them but I just can't anymore. But that doesn't mean I'll hound them over every decision they make, such as whether or not they release a video of the fans forum. There were enough people there, a couple of early postings seem to all line up so I'm confident that what was discussed will be reported accurately.

Much, much bigger things to worry about in my opinion.

 

It's like this thing with the West Stand. I feel for those fans but I also would be devastated if we were relegated. So what's happening on the pitch takes precedent for me right now.

First thing should be making our feelings known about Schopp. I've seen plenty of dissent on message boards but none in the Stadiums. That to me is why Schopp hasn't been sacked. If it got sour in Oakwell after or during a defeat I reckon the board would have acted.

 

Think this Sunday might get a little tense.

 

So if the West Upper had a fire safety issue or has holes in the floor (lol), why has the Lower had to close as well? Hasn't it always been a fire safety issue, it being made of wood 'n all? Do journalists and directors not burn or fall through holes in the floor?

 

I guess there could be a chance that the top tier could collapse on to the lower tier? I dunno?

 

I mean, sure it sounds possible.