RE: Don't agree at all Hopefully things have chnaged since Coventry then.</p> I am utterly mystified that you didnt see that the vast majority of our forward passes agin Coventry were punts up to the front men.</p> We got hardly any crosses in , Mossto barely had a kick.</p> How you get we passed the ball about from those facts bemuses me.</p> When we play well I say we have played well and when we have played badly I'll say we played badly.</p> What are you afraid of?</p>
Vast majority? I think you are mistaken. In the first period we played quite well afetr the first 10 and overall we played a mixed bag maybe quite a few long balls 90% is a load of ballax. It may have consisted of 50% of our forward plays from the defence. How on earth you think we could have 47% of the posession in the game by purely lumping it up front is the mystery. We played **** in the 2nd half. Mostto barely got a kick largely because our midfield are not particularly tuned to looking for him. We failed to get crosses in because the wingers failed to get down the flanks and provide. Ricketts had plenty of the ball but often opted to cut inside & run toward the box rather than get to the byeline or pass and Devaney was diabolical. Brian Howard did not perform. afraid of? what on earth are you talking about?
Sounds like a prospect from what I have heard about him. Been told today that we are gonna pay 50k for him.
RE: from bury message board - they see this as the chance to get dwayne back if he had a trial with bury and they decided not to sign him,aint that a bit worrying!
we seem a bit top heavy with players with this mad spending spree we are on,surely we are going to get rid of some.can i suggest reid and mattis to start with!