If there were a few Bernard Mannings among the muzzies maybe they'd lighten up a bit instead of spending their lives burning flags and effigies.
my guess is......................... this is your homepage</p> http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/ourmessage.html</p>
Iwatched him play i think at Wembley in a League cup final Spurs v Norwich god knows what the year was ?
not at all I just wondered where the photo had come from! even if it's only one tenth true it's rather scary-I have never really gone into the history of it before
RE: He can't have been all that bad. And with western companies such as Coca Cola. (Fanta was the drink designed for the German market)</p> </p> And with the US company IBM who made the punch card system used in the concentration camps. http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/ And with the Bush family who helped him come to power. http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html In fact many western companies and governments were very cosy with Hitler, as with Mussolini, and of course many Nazi's ended up helping put a US rocket on the moon. And the Vatican sat on loads of money and gold that wasn't theirs, as did the Swiss government.</p> Europe is at war is Eurasia. Eurasia is at peace with Europe. Ad finitum. </p>
Yes we know all that.... </p> ...but surely being in bed withcuddly Islamwas his saving grace?</p> And what the hell is that last line supposed to say/mean? </p>
RE: He can't have been all that bad. Yes, make technology and you are compliant if it's used for evil means! The IBM one is utterly ridiculous.
RE: Yes we know all that.... It's not really surprising. How much of that Muslim support came from countries that were under the rule of the British and French Empires? I'll wager that geo-politics and Hitlers need for control over middle eastern oilfields led him to curry favour with Arab countries and making certain political promises in the process. What does it mean? Well Hitler believed in the Arian race and white supremacy. Ergo the Arabs wouldn't have been on his list, but for the sake of winning a war he was prepared to do what was necessary. And for the sake of freeing themselves form the British and French yoke, some Muslim leaders were happy to deal with Hitler. This is hardly surprising. After all Lenin, a man who killed millions, was on the side of the US & UK. Politics has a history of creating strange bedfellows.
RE: Yes we know all that.... You need look no further than the pact made between Germany and Russia before the war, yet Hitler was completely opposed to Communism
RE: Yes we know all that.... Well in military terms he was a numbskull for trying to take on the Russians. Lenin would have sent every last man, woman and child to the front to defeat him. 18 million (possibly a conservative estimate) died. Fu*king horrendous.
So..... </p> "Europe is at war is Eurasia. Eurasia is at peace with Europe. Ad finitum." means "Well Hitler believed in the Arian race and white supremacy. Ergo the Arabs wouldn't have been on his list, but for the sake of winning a war he was prepared to do what was necessary. And for the sake of freeing themselves form the British and French yoke, some Muslim leaders were happy to deal with Hitler." ? </p> Do you want to have another go?</p> </p> </p> </p> </p> . </p>
RE: He can't have been all that bad. So they sold/leased goods, that does not make them responsible for how they are used!
I heard the same arguement used by a gun dealer in the states last year After he sold a mentally ill Korean kid the gun he used to kill 15 students. Arguement didn't wash then either.