That's you fecked then, Scrooge McPolyvelts. "It's like a free ride, when you've already paid". Jay, why don't you just claim benefits for your 11 imaginary friends? You could then afford Sky, ESPN & a haircut.
Clearly you can't remember the last time you used this argument, citing the 'developments' in cricket (technology) made by Sky. Just to refresh your memory, every example you came up with was shown by other posters to have been developed by C4... You ignored it then, like you will now. PS - BBC football coverage has always been better than Sky (in my opinion of course)
We got James Allen, doing articles on our pre-race show. Like Jay mentioned, I'm not sure what coverage we'll get next year. I hope Brundle and Coulthard stay around though.
All Sky have done with football is turned the game into a greedy, money motivated, selfish business that has completely forgotten it's roots and core customer. Forget the gadgets and shiny presentation package, how is that an improvement to the product itself?