Super Lloyd

Lloyd wants to sign.

 

Lloyd doesn't need to be around to sign. He will have a minion for that.

Everything suggests to me he wants to come back here.

 

Hope it's true but doubt it will come to fruition.

 

Cant see us going for both Isgrove and Caenepeel

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

 

If Hecky wants options then we would have Hammill, Jinty , Isgrove and Kent(if those last two are signed) on the wings. That's pretty decent so I say get them both in. Both on 3 year deals. Sell on value!

 

I doubt we will sign jinty,isgrove and Kent we have hammill and marley Watkins who can also play on wing.

 

Why do people keep saying that they can't see us signing both Caenepeel and Isgrove. As far as I can see, Caenepeel is a striker and Isgrove is a winger.

 

He's a strong possibility back on loan I think, but not sure we'll sign him.

 

Why not sign all of them, loan or otherwise. The more good players we have the better. Competition will be good for everyone and we only have 1 out and out winger at the club which is Hammill. Marley is a thousand times better up front as he has shown everyone. We need depth like the rest of this league have but where they have big pay cheques we have big hearts and passion. They won't be on wages that we can't pay now we're in this league. We know if Lloyd and Ash come back it will more than likely be a loan and if we could afford to last year we definitely can this year. Marley, Sam, Ash and Tom as 4 strikers? Kent, Izzy, Adam and Jinty as the wingers? Yes please. We just need a CB and a CM and I would be very confident in finishing at least half way up.

 

Add Ryan Kent to the ones above... then perm one from three

 

I would say the complete opposite if he is going to come back it won,t be another loan it would be permanent.

 

I just think he won't get in Southampton team for at least another season. Giving him a run out at Championship level at a club he's been before would make sense, if they plan to keep him.

Can't see Flecher getting loaned out till after Christmas. Think WH will want to look at him first.

 

Because it's for you to prove your claim, not for someone to disprove it. It's attention seeking ********, until you provide evidence to the contrary. Just tell us a dirty joke next time, it'll go down better. Oo-er...

 

Christmas ? , sithi.

 

What makes you think that? Something you've seen/heard? Or just a random thought?

 

I don't really get it.

When I said that Hecky was to be give the first team job I didn't get grief.

When I said that Otis Khan was signing I didst get grief.

Sam Lavelle and Andre Bikey on trial. No one said anything then.

I wrote on here about how excellent Josh Brownhill was and he had a real diamond on loan.

Yet I say I think Isgrove is signing and I get all this rubbish.

I don't understand it.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

It's because quite often lately you have said that you know something but won't say how you know and how you say you think he's signing but you're ignoring everybody when they ask you why you think he's signing. It comes across as a bit of a 'i know something you don't know '

 

Well it's nothing to do with that.

I never say how I know anything. I just say it. I don't have to tell people in the ins and outs.

Radio Sheffield and the chronicle don't say how they know. They just report it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

You could be right that's going to sign. But people are going to see a player away elsewhere playing for another club as more concrete that he's not signing for us at least not right now, over you saying he's signing but not letting on more.