The Labour Party

I have already told you I can't

But if we don't do anything the growth will be faster, so the problem still exists. It's not a matter of setting arbitrary limits. Its about controlling population growth. You are taking my opinion to an extreme and then exaggerating it.

 

also the rise of the 'lard arse, fast food, binge drinking' generation

means that it's likely that the current young will be the first generation to have a lower life expectancy than their parents</p>

 

That's stupid as it would dis-incentivise

Karen Matthews from having seven kids to five different Dads.</p>

</p>

</p>

 

RE: Whatever way you dress it up you're

Thats an obscene disortion of the arguement. There are no extremes to the ideology at all and it still leaves choice. The simple equation is have children but beyond the first or second the financial responsibility is 100% with the parents. I cant see how that is the rich telling the poor what to do. Not all big families are poor and there are many working class familes who dont have big families but who's taxes are supporting people who through choice have had many children.

 

RE: Top post

(clap) (clap) (clap) well said that man........

 

RE: also the rise of the 'lard arse, fast food, binge drinking' generation

Unfortunately it doesnt get them before they are able to have kids or before the have a big drain on te NHS.

 

'It still leaves choice', but not too much though eh?

Like I said, you don't really want to see it. It all stems from inequality.

 

RE: 'It still leaves choice', but not too much though eh?

I cant see something that simply isn't there.

Everyone is equal but somebody else can pay for my equality.

 

RE: 'It still leaves choice', but not too much though eh?

You keep mentioning equality. You'll never see it while that misnomer's in the way.