Time to go..

and if they knew the titanic was going to sink they wouldn't have called it un-sinkable……but it did and they reported it after the event, imagine if they had reported it sinking before it did!!

 

I must admit I love these posts when I wonder whether you are agreeing or not.

If in doubt I say...Exactly!!

 

It wasn't you that named all the 'outs' and not the 'ins' then? That was someone else eh?

 

But it didn't. Because he's ****. Shouldn't be at the club still never mind playing. Clear chance that was, missed the target from 10 yards. Total wnak.

 

Houdini he is if he survives this defeat

 

To be fair to Whitey, anyone could have just clicked on the poll and read it for themselves. Even the poll creator said that is was a public poll at the time of posting so it's not as if anyone was tricked.

 

I'm glad to see people are seeing that he's the wrong man in charge. The sooner he's gone the better.

We all know that Cryne & Mansford have made bad errors but that doesn't excuse the terrible brand of football Johnson gives us, the dreadful subs, the constant changing of formation & the way he's ruined the confidence of several players, Winnall, Roberts, Davies & Townsend been the main victims.

 

Mmm... I agree that he was unlikely to score. Because he's ****.

But, like doing the lottery, if it had gone in.........

So.....to eliminate being so wise after the event, you need to post at the time.

Otherwise it means nowt.

And Wilkinson is stealing a wage.

 

It's impossible to post at the moment before something happens. You'd have to on here constantly and post about every single thought that goes through your head.

People have been saying on this site for ages that Wilkinson isn't good enough though. It's not like it's gone unsaid until this miss.

 

Yeah but we're talking about someone saying that as soon as Wilko starts stripping off then the manager should be sacked.

Given that Wilko was a sub it seems reasonable that he might be brought on. So why not say for example "if Wilko is a sub then I think the manager (coach) should be sacked" ?

What if we were 3 up when Wilko came on? Should he be sacked then?

Have I made my point?

 

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make so let's leave it.

 

Me neither. He's got himself all tangled up, bless.

I watched the game. I never post on here during a game I'm watching. But after the game I shared my brief thoughts.

The end.

 

I think the point Whitey is making, is that we have an experienced striker in Jackson on the bench who is proven but we bring on someone that has shown absolutely nothing since the 1st game of the season

Sent from my SM-G800F using Forum Runner

 

Exactly. Worra lovely person.

 

I just don't believe he warrants a position at the club, and so to see him picked ahead of more deserving options (who belong to us) yet again, it annoyed me.

 

You posted this 1 week ago lol

I want him in charge until the end of the season, minimum. I've no interest in your what if scenarios, as I am pretty sure we won't keep losing, that we'll improve and that the players and LJ will have taken a lot out of this experience. I believe all this, because I've got faith in him, I back him.

I might be alone in doing so, but we're all unique, and you asked for thoughts and thems mine.

 

Crowley - gone back. No good to us.
Harris - gone back. No good to us.
Rothwell - gone back. No good to us.
Wilkinson - Still here. No good to us (or anybody, on what I've seen).

Devante Cole - signed up for Bradford WTF?

 

What's that all about? Is there any need for it?

 

I did yes. But then I changed my mind. Is that no longer allowed?

It's like saying "I'll always be with my partner". I think I always will be. But if I found out she'd cheated on me, or did something else totally at odds with the relationship, I'd be ending it.

Today, I felt cheated by LJ and called time on my backing of him.

LOL indeed.