Shut up , Mental health issues...................who the fook do you think you are with your pretentious niave arrogance. To put down another fan in the way that you are doing beggers belief. If you do'nt like what Y.N is saying then you might choose to ignore him but, to vent your spleens in the manner you are doing because a person has a different opinion to your is beyond comprehension . One can only assume and I hope to goodness that I am right in my thinking that you are not attending school today and that your inappropriate and immature responses are merely a flash in the pan.
I am saying this They announced the Togwell deal as a smoke screen for the bigger picture i.e. our greatest assett has been sold at a time when no other players had been brought in As for Flinders - its good business to get money for him And lets hope Togwell is a good player My concern is how the news was announced - I think it stinks
it's positive spin the club have got some PR right. of course its a smokescreen - give the good news 1st. it's also common sense
RE: I am saying this Two seperate deals mate. Check the football league website in a few days, and see what they say. You can't lie to them, you have to let them know the exact details of a deal. If it says two seperate transfers on there, then two seperate transfers it is! Get over it
RE: it's positive spin It's not even a kin smokescreen. Palace had been in for Scott before.</p> If anyone was in the slightest bit shocked when after Togwell signed, Flinders signed for Palace they must be very very very naive.</p>
still plenty of time to vote!! http://www.barnsleyfc.org.uk/bbs/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=38998&posts=1
Our greatest asset? How's that work then? Was Flinders likely to play this season? Don't get me wrong, Flinders obviously has some potential, but wasn't he on trial at Chelsea and Wigan last season. I didn't see them tripping over themselves to sign him. I'm sure they could afford to take a risk on a potential world beater. My guess is he's long, long way from the finished product and at the moment in time BFC cannot afford to mould him whilst they have more important things like staying in the Championship to contend with. However, we have signed a player who Ritchie sees in our first 11 this year. Who knows what other clauses are in the Flinders deal for the future.
Interesting response ... Obsession is a mental health issue ... as is craving attention. In my opinion both are exhibited. I may be wrong, if I am so be it. Please don't confuse observation with arrogance, there is a distinct difference.
RE: Our greatest asset?.........is the player with the largest price tag attached and we have sold him, because he was unlikely to play at all. What's the issue?
Maybe The deals ARE connected, maybe we negotiated well and got some thing we couldn't afford in exchange for something they wanted. Maybe there was no Flinders deal until they gave us a player or more money. Maybe we only got into discussion on the back of an exchange. Frankly I don't give a ****. Flinders was always going to get sold - cash flow We need decent players - which by all accounts he is Now say something positive for a change or **** off. It's a decent signing.
RE: Interesting response ... Is it possible that you might give a further reponse and state, in your opinion, that Y.N. is suffering from an obsessive or attention seeking behaviour and again, in your opinion,if he has mental health issues or not.
Dragon Tyke I have never said you are negative I have probably said that I think you are of yer fooking head - but never negative (raiseaglass)
Togwell and McIndoe for Flinders, I'll take that. Flinders was going to go, if his going raises cash to sign two players then great. McIndoe is for now, first choice I would guess, Togwell looks good enough for the 1st team squad too. Good dealing.