Tykes Aim For Loan Deal

RE: You really whinge for the sake of it dont you? ...........Tykeman

I agree that we need an academy and I would be giving Atkinson a game because when I have seen him he has looked quality. Reminded me of Scott Jones who was probably before your time.

You havent answered mine - Do you not want us to sign better players than we currently have?

If the answer is no then you know nothing and if the answer is yes then you agree with me.

Rossi is not an experienced player. End of.

You cant say that he is experienced with so few games under his belt.

 

RE: We need EXPERIENCE - not another youngster.

Don't care if he is a kid, so long as he does the job should he come.

Curtis... Was a kid, Watts.... Was a kid

 

And another other thing..................Tykeman

This shows that there is no joined up thinking from AR or the directors of the club
Shep - we have plenty of cover at the back and young Atkinson is coming through
A few weeks later - we are looking at an inexperienced young central defender from Man U
So we have........
Directors, money to spend on wages / AR, no money to spend on wages
Directors, we need more players / AR, we dont need more players
Directors, we need the academy / AR, we dont need the academy (judgeing on todays announcments)

The club is all over the piano
Or it seems to be from the publics and fans point of veiw

 

there is a BIG difference between Shawcross and Rossi

One has proven himself to have the ability, the other one has not. As such Shawcross can only be classed as a liability and just as much a risk as our own academy players are.</p>

Are BFC willing to risk championship survival on yet another young player with no experience? If we are then shouldn't that risk be taken with a player that is already on our books, won't cost us any extra and if it pays off will actually give us a better player at the end of it rather than just increasing the value of another teams player for them like we did with Michael Chopra?</p>

 

I'm not the only one thinking that huge steps backwards have been taken since Cardiff in May then?

And by that I mean in the stability of the club and the relationship between the fans and club.

 

We once went for experience

Flynn, Chettle, Donovan, Sheron, Gibbs.......
Came for the money, not to play their hearts out for the club. Bugger experience.

 

RE: We once went for experience

To be fair the club can't win. Too many fans are quick to jump on there backs whatever decision they make.
Yes we need some players adding to the squad, but I only want players that are going to improve the squad not just the same level. Now if that means a 17,18, or 19 year old then so be it.

 

To be fair............

AR should walk into the academy and say
'reight lads, pack yer bags, yer out, try to find a job as a brickies labourer cos there int any point hanging abart here'

And that would be fair to the young lads at the club

As a club we can then go out and pick and choose which young player we can bring in.
Without the academy round the neck of the club we can also attract more experienced players to the club cos we have more money available to spend on wages

 

RE: there is a BIG difference between Shawcross and Rossi

We dont even know if it is Shawcross.

 

I'm sure that some of us do know who it is tykeman

 

RE: I'm not the only one thinking that huge steps backwards have been taken since Cardiff in May th

On what basis?

Signing McIndoe and Togwell backward steps?

 

RE: To be fair............

Does anybody even know how much money would be saved if we dropped the acadamy status? I suspect it wouldn't be an awful lot.

 

RE: To be fair............

It apparently is not a lot as you suspect.

At a supporters meeting last season it said the difference was not that big.

 

RE: I'm not the only one thinking that huge steps backwards have been taken since Cardiff in May th

Do you read  E=MC²as E=M?</p>

Only you've just done a really good job of only reading half of a post and totally changing the meaning of it.</p>

 

RE: I'm not the only one thinking that huge steps backwards have been taken since Cardiff in May th

Sounds like the majority of people on here!!

 

Inexperience v experience

If this young guy is any good he will not be stopping at the WELL eg Chopra
So we are willing to risk an inexperienced player in the first team when we have an inexperienced player in the academy that is supposed to be ok
Just dunt add up to me this
If we were bringing in an inexperienced player permanently - can understand that
If we were bringing in an experienced player - great
But an inexperienced player so Man United can get him experience of first team football
While we all hold our breath hoping he dosen't drop a bollock - dunt understand that

 

Watts was w*nk nt

 

RE: Inexperience v experience

You havent answered my question YN.

Do you want better players or not?

 

RE: Inexperience v experience

BUT he might be inexperienced, same as the lad in the academy BUT he is prob a better player than the one we have in the academy.
I understand what you are saying about academy, but end of the day football is a cruel business. If this alleged Man U player is better than what we have in the reserves / accademy then get him down to Oakwell. I personally don't care if he stays for 3 months and we never hear from him again, so long he helps us pick up 3 points a game.

Btw, Rossi is an inexperienced player.

 

no you don't...........Tykeman...............Young Players v MONEY

You don't read ALL of the message
And as proof
You mention the money part of the academy
But you don't say anything about being fair to the young guys in the academy

Cannon fodder I suppose