VAR vote

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by RedfearnsRocket, May 15, 2024.

  1. nezbfc

    nezbfc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    10,884
    Likes Received:
    6,492
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I go less than that.

    Quite a few times you see one replay and can instantly call it. So do it.

    Then the much acclaimed "clear and obvious" is as it should be.

    If they are drawing lines and watching an incident for 3 or 4 minutes, it isn't clear and obvious. On field decision remains.

    It can be that simple
     
    ScubaTyke and Stephen Dawson like this.
  2. icer

    icer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    6,121
    Likes Received:
    3,938
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    VAR is the problem but i get your point. VAR isn't the technology its the people and processes and how the technology is applied. The official definition actually states that VAR is actually the assistant referee who advises the on field ref. Of course this is only aided by video. The protocols, interpretations, structure are also part. For me VAR as a ‘package’ is the problem.

    I'm wary of the stats they use. Whats the % of fans satisfied with VAR. % of manager happy. If there has been so much controversy in a season with 96% accuracy what does that tell us?
     
    Stephen Dawson likes this.
  3. RedfearnsRocket

    RedfearnsRocket Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2023
    Messages:
    2,003
    Likes Received:
    2,793
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Had VAR been in existence in 98 they'd definitely had ruled out Hendrie's opener, looked at Scott Jones high foot for the 2nd goal, looked at the corner for Schmeichels block realising it was Neville, then added on 10 mins with the scores at 2-2
    Fair play to utd barely any appealing
     
    Stephen Dawson likes this.
  4. rin

    ringo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2018
    Messages:
    2,144
    Likes Received:
    1,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Can we just have vote for better refs at Oakwell
     
  5. dreamboy3000

    dreamboy3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    58,343
    Likes Received:
    25,258
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    DB3K Towers
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Some list that. I don't think they should get rid of VAR, but it needs tweaking. People shouldn't be given offside by a toenail. The rule that annoys me more than VAR is when it's offside and the lino risks someone getting injured by not putting the flag up straight away. That's the rule that needs scrapping.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Rev

    Revvie P Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,587
    Likes Received:
    1,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sunny Kinsley
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Had VAR been in existence in 1998 that entire match would likely never have occurred. We'd have had a late penalty at Old Trafford for Neville's challenge on Andy Liddell and likely come out 2-1 winners as a result.
     
    KamikazeCo-Pilot and Merde Tete like this.
  7. Did

    Didcot Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,371
    Likes Received:
    3,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Didcot
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    VAR cannot be un-invented. It is how it is interpreted that needs to be refined.

    Offside is one issue where assistant referees have copped out. They need to flag if they see an offside, players need to "play to the whistle". If the VAR needs to get his slide rule (I'm showing my age now) out, then revert back to the on field decision. In cricket this is "umpires call" every one knows the rule and accepts it.
     
    SuperTyke likes this.
  8. Merde Tete

    Merde Tete Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    17,000
    Likes Received:
    15,846
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Lincoln
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Aye, but there'd probably have never been a replay as we'd have been given a penalty towards the end of the game at Old Trafford.
     
  9. churtonred

    churtonred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2011
    Messages:
    11,294
    Likes Received:
    18,406
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Dingle. No, really!
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I was a big supporter of VAR coming in but was stupid enough to forget that football authorities are completely incapable of implementing anything sensibly or for the good of the game.
     
    SuperTyke, Sheriff and Merde Tete like this.
  10. Rosco

    Rosco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,352
    Likes Received:
    2,847
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Optimist
    Location:
    Born in Birdwell, living in Sin (well...Cheshire).
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What clubs and managers really want if for all decisions to go their way.

    They wanted VAR because referees got things wrong occasionally, now they want rid of VAR because it gets things wrong occasionally.

    They won’t be happy until they themselves are the ref.
     
  11. RedfearnsRocket

    RedfearnsRocket Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2023
    Messages:
    2,003
    Likes Received:
    2,793
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Good point I'd forgotten about that, absolutely stonewall pen on Liddell from Neville
     
  12. dreamboy3000

    dreamboy3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    58,343
    Likes Received:
    25,258
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    DB3K Towers
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
  13. Sup

    Superhiggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2016
    Messages:
    783
    Likes Received:
    893
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The small percentage difference between VAR and original refereeing is not worth the spoiling of fan enjoyment and emotion,and thats not taking into account the laughable offside and handball decisions.
     
    KamikazeCo-Pilot likes this.
  14. She

    Sheriff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    3,222
    Likes Received:
    5,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    VAR as originally proposed, to correct clear and obvious errors, should have been the way forward.

    Instead, they re-defined the rules to fit VAR and created the worst possible outcome, a system that takes ages to implement, makes equally arbitrary decisions based on whether someone has drawn a line correctly and has outcomes that are inconsistent from match to match.

    There's a way to make it work, but the Premier League seem incapable of finding it. Having something akin to umpires calls would be a start point, which would be defined along the lines of 'if we need to draw lines to work it out, then it's not clear and obvious'.

    I'd hate to be watching games as a supporter which has the current version of VAR as a part of it. One of the benefits of being in the lower leagues is that we don't have to suffer it. It's no better at present than the **** refereeing decisions we have to put up with.
     
    KamikazeCo-Pilot likes this.

Share This Page