Why I still back Keith Hill

Does this make Crystal Palace the rule, or does it make them the exception to the rule?

 

If you are concerned about further decreases in attendance and season ticket renewal then you will sooner or later have to question your allegiance to Keith Hill, because he does appear to be primary factor number one in the eyes of your fellow supporters.

Don't get me wrong, I'm still rooting for him but if it means the risk of 1000 less season tickets renewed, relegated or not, then any arguments we can offer are void and we have no choice but to fall into line with the majority. The club comes first, last and always - and that's us, the supporters.

 

Think about it, there was never a year 0 AD. And of course I'm mental, I support BFC.

 

What year was Jesus born, because if that was 1AD, somebody has pinched a year and there needs to be an investigation.

 

Ha ha brilliant! You've got me on the most technical of technicalities. However, according to our calendar, the year 2000 was in this century, so my point still stands.

You nutty nutter, you. (hatsoff):biggrin:

 

Millwall aren't doing too badly either. The season Burnley were promoted their crowds were smaller than ours. As were Blackpool's. There's four exceptions for you.

 

I do not disagree with your point at all.

I do disagree that staying away is the best way to bring about an improvement in the fortunes of the football team you claim to support.

 

The important thing is that you acknowledge that they are exceptions, and I am pleased that you have done so.